The PDX Alliance Portal to the International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran:
http://www.theportlandalliance.org/persian

See "No War with Iran" March & Rally Coverage! http://www.theportlandalliance.org/bytes
Calls for Release Mount on the Anniversary of House Arrest of Mousavi, Karroubi, and Rahnavard
(26 January 2012) Shirin Ebadi, the 2003 Nobel Peace Laureate, today called for a sustained international campaign for the release of three opposition leaders under house arrest for nearly a year.
“I support the call [of political prisoners] and invite all freedom-loving people across the globe to do all they can for the release of prisoners of conscience in Iran, particularly Ms. Zahra Rahnavard, Mr. Mir Hossein Mousavi, and Mr. Mehdi Karroubi,” Ebadi said in her statement released today.
Referring to the upcoming parliamentary elections, Ebadi said, “I invite all my compatriots to boycott these staged elections on 2 March to once more show the international community that the Islamic Republic of Iran lacks legitimacy.”
Ebadi’s statement was released on the heels of a similar call by 39 prominent political prisoners published on the opposition website Kaleme on 25 January 2012. The statement said, “We call upon all freedom fighting citizens across the globe to create public awareness regarding the upcoming sham and rigged parliamentary elections in February, and to continue to do everything in their power to ensure that the detained leaders of the Green Movement are released in the month of February.”
The International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran fully supports Ebadi’s and the political prisoners’ call for the immediate release of Rahnavard, Mousavi, and Karroubi.
Authorities placed Mousavi, Karroubi, and Rahnavard under de facto house arrest in February 2011, after they called for a rally in solidarity with popular movements in Tunisia and Egypt. Authorities ignored their request for a rally permit. Nevertheless, thousands of people took peacefully to the streets on 14 February 2011, only to face violent repression by authorities.
Since that time, Mousavi, Karroubi, and Rahnavard have been largely held at their homes with little to no access to communication and only infrequent contact with their families. Iranian authorities have repeatedly said that Mousavi, Karroubi, and Rahnavard are not subject to formal judicial proceedings and no charges have ever been formally announced.
“After a year without indictment or trial, what is happening to Mousavi, Karroubi, and Rahnavard can no longer be called a house arrest without formal process. This is simply a kidnapping,” said Hadi Ghaemi, spokesperson for the Campaign.
Signatories to the 25 January 2012 call in alphabetical order:
Bahman Ahmadi Amouee; Hassan Asadi Zeidabadi; Javad Emam; Mohsen Amin Zadeh; Massoud Bastani; Emad Bahavar; Seyed Ali Reza Beheshti Shirazi; Seyed Mostafa Tajzadeh; Saeed Jalalifar; Ali Jamali; Amir Khoram; Babak Dashab; Mohammad Davari; Majid Dori; Amir Khosrow Dalirsani; Ali Reza Rajai; Hossein Zarini; Issa Saharkhiz; Davood Soleymani; Mohammad Seifzadeh; Ghassem Shole Saadi; Keyvan Samimi; Fereydoon Seyedizad; Jalil Taheri; Mohammad Farid Taheri Ghazvini; Feizollah Arabsorkhi; Siamak Ghaderi; Abolfazl Ghadyani; Farshad Ghorbanpour; Saeed Matinpour; Mohsen Mohagheghi; Mehdi Mahmoudian; Mohammad Reza Motamadnia; Ali Malihi; Abdollah Momeni; Mohsen Mirdamadi; Behzad Nabavi; Zia Nabavi and; Abolfazl Abedini
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/22/sunday-review/confronting-iran-in-a-year-of-elections.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&ref=opinion
Confronting Iran in a Year of Elections
David E. Sanger,
January 22, 2012
Once again we have David Sanger with a barely-veiled call for military action against Iran. He once again asserts that Iran has a program leading to making nuclear weapons stating that President Obama faces the choice of: "whether to approve an airstrike to thwart an adversary bent on becoming a nuclear-weapons state," despite the fact that there is not one scintilla of evidence anywhere that such a military weapons program exists in Iran.
He cites unnamed (of course) "former Israeli intelligence officials" to assert that Iran has long gone past "'the point of no return,' an ill-defined line beyond which Iran could rapidly produce a bomb," ignoring other named officials, even Defense Minister Ehud Barak, whose views are far less extreme.
The newly begun enrichment of uranium for medical purposes in the Fordow facility is labeled as "the latest violation" as if Iran is breaking a law. In fact the facility is completely monitored by the IAEA and was announced before it was even constructed--not to mention Iran's inalienable right to uranium enrichment for peaceful purposes as guaranteed in the Nuclear Non-proliferation treaty. Moreover 19 other NPT signatory states enrich uranium, and some (notably Japan) have already declared their intent to be ready to manufacture nuclear weapons if need be. Iran is apparently the only one whose actions are a "violation" in Mr. Sanger's estimation.
He falsely implies that European powers are eager for some kind of stronger action against Iran--and then adds an insult to the reader's intelligence by hinting that Russia really wants this as well.
Finally, in a cheap move, he invokes the Iranian hostage crisis in 1979-80 dredging up the specter of what many hawks see as the ultimate reason for payback against Iran (Yeah! Get 'em!).
Sanger's cheer-leading for an attack on Iran has been incessant for eight years. He has a privileged position at the Times, and misuses it to beat the drums of war. Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum re-echo this. It is notable that at this writing the NY Times has not put up a comments section for this article. Anyone wishing to object must write a letter to the editor (letters@nytimes.com) or to the public editor (public@nytimes.com). I am doing both, since I believe Mr. Sanger must be confronted at every turn. He does tremendous damage to U.S. Foreign policy and puts our nation in greater danger with every misleading article he writes.
William O. Beeman
Professor and Chair the Department of Anthropology at the University of Minnesota
in Room 395 at the HHH Center on 301 19th Avenue S. in Minneapolis, MN 55455
(612) 625-3400 / wbeeman@umn.edu
http://www.facebook.com/pages/International-Campaign-for-Human-Rights-in-Iran/49929580840
Please read Nahal Sahabi's last blog (a week before her suicide on September 28, 2011)
about her friend Behnam Ganji who killed himself 27 days earlier, very sad indeed !!!:
http://nahal53.blogfa.com/9006.aspx
http://www.iranhumanrights.org/2011/09/investigate-detention-after-suicides
Investigate Two Tragic Suicides of Close Friends of Detained Activist
Authorities Stay Silent About Kouhyar Goudarzi's Incommunicado Detention
and the Suicides of Behnam Ganji and Nahal Sahabi
We can get along. War is not the answer.
What: http://www.theportlandalliance.org/persian
"Muslims are harassed? ...PLEASE....if you don't like it here, go back to your Muslim country, you don't want to assimilate anything American, you don't feel welcome, you don't respect our country...why are you here? Oh yes, freedom, money, food, electricity, water, toilets, sewer systems, jobs...." From recent posts to Portland 's Willamette Week's web site (wweek.com).
These comments represent a system of attitudes and beliefs held by many even in the liberal island of Portland, Oregon . Educational campaigns, letters in response and sometimes protest may all be legitimate attempts to address what for the most part is simply ignorance, but that is not enough.
Ahmed has written an original screenplay titled "The Pilgrimage" based on his Hajj (Pilgrimage to Mecca ). http://www.ahmed-ahmed.com
Tissa Hami is one of the world's few female Muslim stand-up comics. She grew up in a traditional Iranian family in a predominantly white suburb of Boston . She holds Bachelor's and Master's degrees in international affairs. Tissa hopes her comedy will help break down stereotypes about Muslim women and foster understanding between Iranians and Americans. She has a frequent media presence and was featured in the PBS documentary about Muslim comedians: http://www.pbs.org/weta/crossroads/about/show_standup.html
http://www.tissahami.com
Dan Ahdoot went to college at the prestigious Johns Hopkins University and graduated with honors as a premed student. But he chose comedy over medicine and has been celebrated ever since. Dan's stand-up act is based on his hilarious observations about everyday life as a young Jewish Iranian living in New York City . http://www.standupdan.com
Negin Farsad grew up in Southern California . She holds a Bachelors Degree in Theater Arts and Government from Cornell University . Since moving to New York she has been writing and performing comedy at night while completing a Masters Degree in Race Relations and a second in Urban Management at Columbia University by day. She also produced a film. http://www.neginfarsad.com
Jimmy Dore, aka Citizen Jimmy, was born into a Catholic family of twelve in a very blue-collar neighborhood on the south side of Chicago . He is part of Comedy Central and other comedy shows around the country. LA Weekly called his show “Completely Offensive and Very Funny!” http://www.jimmydorecomedy.com
We have collected some samples of performers’ works on our Blog that you can use. (http://blog.aifcpdx.org) In addition please check the comedians’ websites for more information and call us if you are interested in writing a story about them or about this event. We will gladly arrange for interview opportunities with the performers.
These artists and performers are supported by American Iranian Friendship Council (AIFC), Andisheh Center , & Arab American Cultural Center of Oregon (AACCO) And they are endorsed by The Northwest Alliance for Alternative Media & Education (NAAME), dba The Portland Alliance. http://www.theportlandalliance.org
Persian Concerns.
http://www.iranhumanrights.org/2011/10/un-report-documents-irans-human-rights-crisis/
UN Report Documents Iran's Human Rights Crisis
(15 October 2011) The Iranian government should immediately allow access to the UN appointed Special Rapporteur Ahmed Shaheed to address Iran’s ongoing human rights crisis, the International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran said today, following the release of Shaheed’s interim report.
The interim report by the Special Rapporteur documents the multi-faceted human rights crisis gripping Iran. It provides details of the persecution and prosecution of civil society actors, including political activists, journalists, students, artists, lawyers, and environmental activists; as well as the routine denial of freedom of assembly, women’s rights, the rights of religious and ethnic minorities, and the skyrocketing rates of executions.
The Iranian government has so far rejected any cooperation with Shaheed’s mandate. The report is based on first-hand testimonies of victims as well as interviews with Iranian human rights and civil society actors conducted outside of Iran.
“This report demonstrates that the Iranian government can run from the truth but cannot hide from it. The depth and details of the human rights crisis in the country, documented in this report, obligate UN member states to demand full compliance from Iran regarding its international commitments,” said Hadi Ghaemi, the Campaign’s spokesperson.
In his report, Shaheed notes several requests to engage with the Iranian government, all of which have been unanswered. On 19 October, Shaheed will make a formal presentation of his findings to the UN General Assembly in New York.
Shaheed’s report is released on the heels of an annual report by the Secretary General, Ban Ki-Moon, which also confirmed the continuing and deteriorating human rights situation in Iran.
The Campaign called on UN member states to take a strong and unified stance in support of the Special Rapporteur’s mandate and use all diplomatic means to urge Iran to cooperate with it.
The Special Rapporteur’s report highlights the house arrest of opposition leaders Mir Hossein Mousavi and Mehdi Karroubi who have been under an extra-judicial confinement since 14 February 2011.
The interim report notes “certain practices that amount to torture, cruel, or degrading treatment of the detained, the imposition of the death penalty in absence of proper judicial safeguards, the status of women, the persecution of religious and ethnic minorities, the erosion of civil and political rights — in particular the harassment, intimidation of human rights defenders and civil society actors.”
The extensive application of the death penalty, particularly the use of secret mass executions carried out in Vakilabad prison in the city of Mashad in absence of due process, is also highlighted in the Special Rapporteur’s interim report. It notes that in 2010, at least 300 secret executions were reported, as well as at least 146 such executions in 2011 carried out at Vakilabad. The Iranian authorities have been silent on these secret executions.
Despite time limitations on creating the report, it covers dozens of cases of individuals persecuted and prosecuted for their political beliefs and civil society and human rights activism.
The interim report also takes note of several letters written by prisoners detailing their torture and ill-treatment, as well as inhumane prison conditions, including letters by prisoners of conscience Abdollah Momeni, Ahmad Ghabel, and Omid Kokabee.
“We welcome the Special Rapporteur’s report which documents some of the most urgent issues facing the Iranian human rights community,” Ghaemi said.
The Campaign notes that Iran’s complete lack of cooperation with the Special Rapporteur’s mandate and the government’s continued refusal to allow him access to the country is an indication that it has no intention of taking meaningful steps to improve the human rights situation.
Listen to the Campaign's Weekly Iran Rights Podcast
For the latest human rights developments in Iran visit the Campaign’s website
For interviews or more information:
Hadi Ghaemi, in New York: +1 917-669-5996
Aaron Rhodes, in Hamburg: +49 170-323-8314
|
WAR IS NOT THE ANSWER:
"Herein lies the difference between NIAC's approach and the tactics of the MEK and these neo-conservatives. Though they pretend to target the IRGC, their policies in reality pave the way for a war that would see hundreds of thousands dead. NIAC and the Iranian-American community as a whole, on the other hand, puts the well being of the peoples of America and Iran at the center. We have consistently opposed war, and instead pursued policies that would target the IRGC and the leaders of the Islamic Republic without hurting the Iranian people or risking a war that would be disastrous for both countries."
"The FBI has detailed how the MEK accuses any and all of its detractors of being agents of the Islamic Republic." Of course Portland has its own lone MEK warrior whose only mission in life seems to be to stalk and attack those who happen to not share his point of view...
GR
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the past few weeks, the Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK) has been launching relentless attacks against the National Iranian American Council (NIAC). The immediate reason is the Iranian-American campaign spearheaded by NIAC to keep the MEK on the U.S.'s terrorist list. NIAC and others have launched this campaign because delisting the MEK
would unleash a major force for a U.S.-Iran war, undermine the peaceful
pro-democracy movement in Iran while empowering anti-democratic
hardliners, and put the free voices of the Iranian-American community
under threat.
The MEK's attacks are not new. The MEK and neo-conservative elements supporting them have for years been orchestrating attacks against prominent Iranian American individuals and institutions who do not subscribe to their views. The targets have included not just me and NIAC, but also individuals like Ramin Jahanbeglou, Vali Nasr, and Shirin Ebadi. Indeed, the U.S. Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI) has detailed how the MEK accuses any and all of its detractors of being agents of the Islamic Republic.
NIAC poses a threat to the MEK in many ways - because we give the Iranian-American community a voice in Washington that opposes war, opposes indiscriminate sanctions and supports human rights and indigenous democratization in Iran. The MEK has a radically different agenda, and like some of its neoconservative counterparts, wants to silence independent voices opposing their pro-war agenda. The MEK and these neo-conservatives sought hard to hide the true source and reasons for the attacks against prominent Iranian Americans and NIAC. The MEK knows very well how despised they are in the Iranian-American community. More often than not, their attack dogs pretend to be Monarchists or of some other denomination. Few, if any, admit their ties to the MEK. And these neo-conservatives know that the attacks will appear more credible if they have an Iranian face. But recently, the MEK's desperation has shone through. Now, they no longer pretend to be disconnected from their campaigns against other Iranian Americans. Their attacks are posted on their own websites, and the attackers openly declare their dedication and loyalty to the MEK. In this new desperation, they have also revealed their larger agenda. In a recent article, the MEK juxtaposed NIAC's current campaign to educate the public about the ramifications of delisting the MEK from terror list against an analysis I wrote in 2007 describing the likely consequences of the Bush administration's plan to include the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corp (IRGC) on that same list. The purpose of this comparison is to support the baseless claims by the MEK and its network of supporters that NIAC supports the regime in Iran. The comparison falls flat. The designation would have had no economic impact on the IRGC,
which was already exhaustively sanctioned by the United States.
Instead, the designation was intended to advance a cause for war before
the Bush administration's term ended. Indeed, the entire issue seemed
ripped straight out of the Iraq war playbook. This is why several
leading U.S. policymakers opposed the measure, including the bipartisan
leadership of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee (led by now
Vice-President Joseph Biden and Republican Senator Richard Lugar). Senator Joe Lieberman, one of the strongest advocates for an Iran war in the Senate, later introduced the idea in legislative form and added language that explicitly gave a green light to conducting military action against Iran. The Kyl-Lieberman amendment stated the following: (4) to support the prudent and calibrated use of all instruments of United States national power in Iraq, including diplomatic, economic, intelligence, and military instruments, in support of the policy described in paragraph (3) with respect to the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran and its proxies. The call for the "use of all instruments" including military instruments is what constituted a green light for war. In reality, the amendment had less to do with listing the IRGC as a terrorist organization than supporting military action against Iran before Bush's term came to an end. The amendment caused a storm in the Senate - and even the Democratic primary debates - because it was rightly seen as an effort to start a war with Iran. Opposition from anti-war groups and Lieberman's colleagues in the eventually saw the above paragraph deleted from the amendment. To suggest that my analysis, or Senator Biden and others' opposition to this move, was favorable to the IRGC is preposterous. Indeed, NIAC has been a key supporter of precision sanctions targeting the IRGC and leaders of the Islamic Republic. These targeted sanctions hit the elements in the Islamic Republic responsible for crafting policy and for the human rights abuses, while sparing innocent civilians and allowing the nascent opposition movement room to grow and build their power. And herein lies the difference between NIAC's approach and the tactics of the MEK and these neo-conservatives. Though they pretend to target the IRGC, their policies in reality pave the way for a war that would see hundreds of thousands dead. NIAC and the Iranian-American community as a whole, on the other hand, puts the well being of the peoples of the America and Iran at the center. We have consistently opposed war, and instead pursued policies that would target the IRGC and the leaders of the Islamic Republic without hurting the Iranian people or risking a war that would be disastrous for both countries. The questions people should ask themselves is why the MEK and these neo-conservatives consistently support policies that on the surface appear to target the clerical regime, but in reality drive the US and Iran towards a military confrontation. Our ability to give the Iranian-American community an opportunity to be heard in Washington DC is a threat both to the agenda of the MEK and that of these neo-conservatives. Therefore, the attacks against independent voices in the Iranian-American community and NIAC will continue. But as the community comes to understand the agenda of the MEK, it will no longer buy their conspiracy theories. |
© Copyright 2001 - 2011 www.Mani.tk
|